Skip to content
A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Appellate Advocacy Blog Weekly Roundup Friday, November 12

WeeklyRoundupGraphic

Each week, the Appellate Advocacy Blog Weekly Roundup presents a few tidbits of news and Twitter posts from the past week concerning appellate advocacy. As always, if you see something during the week that you think we should be sure to include, feel free to send a quick note to either (1) Dan Real at DReal@Creighton.edu or on Twitter (@Daniel_L_Real) or (2) Catharine Du Bois at DuBoisLegalWriting@gmail.com or on Twitter @CLDLegalWriting.

 

SCOTUS Opinions and News:
 
 
  • On Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Ramirez v. Collier, a case asking whether death row inmates are entitled to have a spiritual adviser in the execution chamber and whether the religious adviser should be allowed to touch the inmate.  During the argument, the Court’s conservative Justices seemed skeptical of the inmate’s claims, suggesting that his assertions of having found religion after being convicted and requesting the presence of and physical contact from his spiritual adviser amount to attempts to “gam[e] the system” that, if approved, could flood the system with endless variations on the requests.
  • On Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. Vaello-Madero, a case asking whether residents of Puerto Rico should be allowed to receive Supplemental Security Income benefits.  In the case, Jose Luis Vaello-Madero, an American citizen born in Puerto Rico, became seriously ill while living in New York, began receiving SSI benefits while in New York, and then lost the benefits when he moved back to Puerto Rico to be closer to his family. 
 
State Appellate Court Opinions and News:
 
  • On Tuesday, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed a ruling against Johnson & Johnson, finding that the trial judge incorrectly interpreted public nuisance laws, overturning a $465 million verdict issued in 2019 in a case asserting that J&J’s marketing, sale, and distribution of opioids constituted a public nuisance.
  • On Wednesday, a Texas court heard arguments over Texas’ controversial abortion ban, Senate Bill 8 (the Texas Heart Beat Act).